Side by side
Linkzoid facts from our docs; for suite details check each vendor's current pages| Question | Suite report (Semrush, Ahrefs) | Script on Linkzoid |
|---|
| Who reads the output | A person, in a browser | A cron job, a CSV, a Slack post |
|---|
| Pricing shape | Monthly subscription | Prepaid credit, from $0.10 per 1,000 calls |
|---|
| Keywords and rank tracking | Yes, the main product | No |
|---|
| Crawl freshness | Fresher and broader on big suites | Index refreshed about monthly |
|---|
| Bulk scoring of 2,000 domains | Often limited by plan | One call, 1 credit |
|---|
| History kept for you | Inside the tool | In your own repo or database |
|---|
| Setup time | Minutes | An hour for the first script |
|---|
Our position
Keep the suite for research and use a script for chores
If you also pay for keyword and position data, you already hold the best backlink UI. Add a script only for the parts a person should not repeat by hand.
- Ahrefs sells API units from $129 a month for 200,000 units
- Pulling a report weekly by hand is a chore worth automating
- Do not drop a suite just to save the link-data cost
What the chore usually is
Most people who ask about exporting a report do the same dull thing each month. Open the tool, filter, download, paste into a sheet.
That is a loop. A 12-line script does it, and it does it at the same minute whether you remember or not. The numbers will differ from the suite, because every index sees a different slice of the web and DR is our own formula.
Compare trends, never absolute values across tools. If your referring-domain count rises in both, believe it.
Example monthly cost, hypothetical
Invented portfolio of 30 domains, one monthly run| Job | Calls | Credits | Dollars |
|---|
| overview for each domain | 30 | 0 | $0.0000 |
|---|
| refdomains for each | 30 | 60 | $0.0060 |
|---|
| anchors for each | 30 | 60 | $0.0060 |
|---|
| bulk_dr on the combined list | 1 | 1 | $0.0001 |
|---|
| Total per month | 91 | 121 | $0.0121 |
|---|
Next steps
Start with one domain and the weekly snapshot. Add the prospecting script only when you have a reason to reach out to anyone.
Run both for a month if the budget allows. Keep the suite export and the script output in the same folder, and compare referring-domain counts at the end. The point is to learn how far apart two indexes sit before you trust either one for a decision. Then choose.
Short test first.
When the suite wins outright
Anything that needs keywords. If your question is which pages rank, which terms you lost or what a rival earns from search, a link API cannot help.
The same goes for a client who wants a polished PDF. Build it in the suite and sleep well.
A script wins when the question is narrow, repeated and numeric: how many referring domains do these thirty sites have this month, and which of them changed by more than ten percent? That is a loop over a list, and a loop is what we are for.
Questions we get about suites and scripts
- Can a script replace a Semrush backlinks report entirely?
- For the link numbers, often yes. For the surrounding tooling, no: keyword gaps, rank tracking and site audits sit outside what a link API does. Most people keep the suite for research and use a script for the monthly chores.
- Will my numbers match the suite?
- No. Every index crawls a different slice of the web and scores it differently, so absolute counts and DR values differ. Compare direction over time inside one source, and never mix vendors in the same chart.